| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 4110 is 1.6 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
50654
Core
Picasso
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
11264 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
12.29k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
3.64k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
6.55k (x1.19)
TOTAL
30.46k
25.46k (x0.84)

Multithread

3750H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
20.42k (x1.35)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
95.83k (x1.28)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
30.88k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
9.7k (x1.6)
TOTAL
123.97k
156.83k (x1.27)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
18.78k (x1.37)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
16.25k (x0.71)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.99k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
6.8k (x1.29)
TOTAL
46.91k
45.82k (x0.98)

Multithread

3750H

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
133.55k (x2.64)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
108.43k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
30.02k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
9.48k (x1.56)
TOTAL
175.18k
281.48k (x1.61)

Performance/W
3750H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4