Ryzen 7 3750H vs Xeon E5-2620 v4
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2620 v4 is based on Broadwell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the E5-2620 v4 gets 237.8 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2620 v4 is 1.4 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
406f1
Core
Picasso
Broadwell-EP
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
Socket 2011-3
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
20480 kB
Date
January 2019
March 2016
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
29.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
237.83k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
2.6k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
7.55k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
2.61k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
2.03k (x0.37)
TOTAL
30.46k
14.79k (x0.49)
Multithread
3750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
17.41k (x1.15)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
75.46k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
26.25k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.65k (x0.77)
TOTAL
123.97k
123.78k (x1)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
12.16k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
11.82k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.02k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
2.4k (x0.46)
TOTAL
46.91k
29.39k (x0.63)
Multithread
3750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
103.77k (x2.05)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
102.28k (x1.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
26.13k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
5.65k (x0.93)
TOTAL
175.18k
237.83k (x1.36)
Performance/W
3750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1221 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
307 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
66 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
2798 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
E5-2620 v4
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
4054 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
3939 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
799 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
9798 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4