Ryzen 7 3750H vs Xeon E3-1230 v5
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the E3-1230 v5 is based on Skylake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 25.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 4.9 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the E3-1230 v5 gets 25.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 4.9 times faster than the E3-1230 v5. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e3
Core
Picasso
Skylake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
80 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2015
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
9.52k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
37.88k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
0.7k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
2.8k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
0.85k (x0.18)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
1.88k (x0.34)
TOTAL
30.46k
6.23k (x0.2)
Multithread
3750H
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
2.74k (x0.18)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
12.87k (x0.17)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
3.89k (x0.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.03k (x0.99)
TOTAL
123.97k
25.52k (x0.21)
Performance/W
3750H
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
34 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2139 points/W
161 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
796 points/W
49 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
75 points/W
TOTAL
3542 points/W
319 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
E3-1230 v5
Test#1 (Integers)
945 points/GHz
183 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4105 points/GHz
738 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
223 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1378 points/GHz
496 points/GHz
TOTAL
7615 points/GHz
1640 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4