| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i7-9850H


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-9850H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-9850H gets 289.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-9850H is 1.7 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ed
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
49.24k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
289.3k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
4.11k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
15.19k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
5.04k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
11.98k (x2.17)
TOTAL
30.46k
36.32k (x1.19)

Multithread

3750H

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
22.68k (x1.49)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
83.77k (x1.12)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
30.37k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.55k (x1.41)
TOTAL
123.97k
145.37k (x1.17)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
19.83k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
16.52k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.87k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
9.02k (x1.71)
TOTAL
46.91k
49.24k (x1.05)

Multithread

3750H

i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
130.19k (x2.58)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
121.44k (x1.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
28.05k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
9.62k (x1.59)
TOTAL
175.18k
289.3k (x1.65)

Performance/W
3750H
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2893 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2699 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
623 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
214 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
6429 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i7-9850H
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
4311 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
3591 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
841 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1961 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
10703 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4