| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i7-7700HQ


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-7700HQ is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-7700HQ gets 208.3 k points.

Summarizing, the i7-7700HQ is 1.2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.8 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2017
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
56.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
208.33k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.82k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
15.49k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.96k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
8.82k (x1.6)
TOTAL
30.46k
33.09k (x1.09)

Multithread

3750H

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
14.15k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
65.81k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
22.41k (x0.8)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.21k (x0.86)
TOTAL
123.97k
107.57k (x0.87)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
23.27k (x1.7)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
20.35k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
7.92k (x1.5)
TOTAL
46.91k
56.29k (x1.2)

Multithread

3750H

i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
93.11k (x1.84)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
89.03k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
21.29k (x0.84)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
4.9k (x0.81)
TOTAL
175.18k
208.33k (x1.19)

Performance/W
3750H
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2069 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1978 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
473 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
109 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
4629 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i7-7700HQ
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6124 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5354 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1251 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2083 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
14813 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4