Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i7-5820K
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i7-5820K gets 117.4 k points.
Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.1 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
306f2
Core
Picasso
Haswell-E
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
15360 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
129.06k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.82k (x1.01)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
9.64k (x0.59)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.29k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.78k (x0.69)
TOTAL
30.46k
21.53k (x0.71)
Multithread
3750H
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
18.07k (x1.19)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
64.25k (x0.86)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
27.03k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.03k (x1.32)
TOTAL
123.97k
117.38k (x0.95)
Performance/W
3750H
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
129 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2139 points/W
459 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
796 points/W
193 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
3542 points/W
838 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
945 points/GHz
1062 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4105 points/GHz
2678 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1191 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1378 points/GHz
1050 points/GHz
TOTAL
7615 points/GHz
5981 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4