| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i7-4600U


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4600U is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i7-4600U gets 64.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 2.7 times faster than the i7-4600U . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
40651
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1168
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
28.98k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
64.55k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
14.37k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
8.31k (x0.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
3.35k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
2.96k (x0.56)
TOTAL
46.91k
28.98k (x0.62)

Multithread

3750H

i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
31.32k (x0.62)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
20.17k (x0.22)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
8.02k (x0.32)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
5.03k (x0.83)
TOTAL
175.18k
64.55k (x0.37)

Performance/W
3750H
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2088 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1345 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
535 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
336 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
4303 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i7-4600U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
4353 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
2517 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1015 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
896 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
8781 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4