Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-9400F
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-9400F is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.9 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-9400F gets 331.2 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-9400F is 1.9 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
906ea
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/6
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
9216 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
67.77k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
331.19k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
27.15k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
23.63k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.38k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
11.61k (x2.2)
TOTAL
46.91k
67.77k (x1.44)
Multithread
3750H
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
156.61k (x3.1)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
138k (x1.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
29.45k (x1.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
7.14k (x1.18)
TOTAL
175.18k
331.19k (x1.89)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2409 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2123 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
453 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
110 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
5095 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-9400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6622 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5763 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1312 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2831 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
16528 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4