| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-7200U


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-7200U is based on Kaby Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-7200U gets 97.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.8 times faster than the i5-7200U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806e9
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1356
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
3072 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2016
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
44.94k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
97.52k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.15k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
12.85k (x0.78)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.14k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
5.21k (x0.95)
TOTAL
30.46k
25.36k (x0.83)

Multithread

3750H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
6.28k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
29.27k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
9.31k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.71k (x0.77)
TOTAL
123.97k
49.56k (x0.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
19.34k (x1.41)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
17.47k (x0.76)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.08k (x0.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.04k (x0.77)
TOTAL
46.91k
44.94k (x0.96)

Multithread

3750H

i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
42.86k (x0.85)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
41.3k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
9.69k (x0.38)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
3.68k (x0.61)
TOTAL
175.18k
97.52k (x0.56)

Performance/W
3750H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2857 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2753 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
646 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
245 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
6501 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-7200U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6239 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5637 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1316 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
14496 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4