| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-4440


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4440 is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-4440 gets 138.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.3 times faster than the i5-4440 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306c3
Core
Picasso
Haswell
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
84 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2013
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
38.29k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
138.69k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.71k (x0.98)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
9.23k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.28k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
3.8k (x0.69)
TOTAL
30.46k
21.02k (x0.69)

Multithread

3750H

i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
13.33k (x0.88)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
34.2k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
15.91k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
6.56k (x1.08)
TOTAL
123.97k
70k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
19.08k (x1.39)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
10.47k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.53k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.21k (x0.8)
TOTAL
46.91k
38.29k (x0.82)

Multithread

3750H

i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
73.26k (x1.45)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
41.01k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
17.12k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
7.3k (x1.2)
TOTAL
175.18k
138.69k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3750H
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
872 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
488 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
204 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
1651 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-4440
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
5783 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
3174 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1372 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1275 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
11604 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4