| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-3470


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-3470 is based on Ivy Bridge.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 124 k points while the i5-3470 gets 77 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i5-3470 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
306a9
Core
Picasso
Ivy Bridge
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
77 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2012
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
31.71k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
94.15k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.62k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
10.08k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.47k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
5.39k (x0.98)
TOTAL
30.46k
23.56k (x0.77)

Multithread

3750H

i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
13.66k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
37.73k (x0.5)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
17.07k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.57k (x1.41)
TOTAL
123.97k
77.04k (x0.62)

Performance/W
3750H
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
434 points/W
177 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2139 points/W
490 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
796 points/W
222 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
174 points/W
111 points/W
TOTAL
3542 points/W
1000 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-3470
Test#1 (Integers)
945 points/GHz
1005 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
4105 points/GHz
2801 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1187 points/GHz
1240 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1378 points/GHz
1498 points/GHz
TOTAL
7615 points/GHz
6544 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4