Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-10400
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10400 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-10400 gets 367.7 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10400 is 2.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0653
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
12288 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
69.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
367.65k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
27.46k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
24.28k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.65k (x1.13)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
11.92k (x2.26)
TOTAL
46.91k
69.31k (x1.48)
Multithread
3750H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
165.5k (x3.27)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
156.32k (x1.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
39.88k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
5.96k (x0.98)
TOTAL
175.18k
367.65k (x2.1)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2546 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2405 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
614 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
92 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
5656 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-10400
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6386 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2772 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
16118 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4