| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-1035G1


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-1035G1 is based on Ice Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-1035G1 gets 171.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1 times faster than the i5-1035G1. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
706e5
Core
Picasso
Ice Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1526
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
55.37k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
171.65k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.88k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
14.98k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
9.7k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
8.6k (x1.56)
TOTAL
30.46k
37.15k (x1.22)

Multithread

3750H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
14.61k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
54.9k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
27.58k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.04k (x0.83)
TOTAL
123.97k
102.13k (x0.82)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
21.5k (x1.57)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
17.71k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
7.92k (x1.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.24k (x1.56)
TOTAL
46.91k
55.37k (x1.18)

Multithread

3750H

i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
73.03k (x1.44)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
68.19k (x0.73)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
24.89k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
5.54k (x0.91)
TOTAL
175.18k
171.65k (x0.98)

Performance/W
3750H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
4869 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
4546 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1660 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
369 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
11443 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-1035G1
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
5972 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
4919 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2290 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
15381 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4