Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-10300H
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i5-10300H is 1.4 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
a0652
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
246.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
27.14k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
24.75k (x1.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.73k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
11.84k (x2.25)
TOTAL
46.91k
69.47k (x1.48)
Multithread
3750H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
105.77k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
107.47k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
24.82k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
8.02k (x1.32)
TOTAL
175.18k
246.07k (x1.4)
Performance/W
3750H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
5468 points/W
Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4