| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-10210U


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10210U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-10210U gets 147.8 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
1.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
August 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
56.03k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
147.78k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
22.96k (x1.67)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
20.8k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.76k (x0.95)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
7.5k (x1.42)
TOTAL
46.91k
56.03k (x1.19)

Multithread

3750H

i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
66.43k (x1.31)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
62.38k (x0.67)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
14.52k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
4.45k (x0.73)
TOTAL
175.18k
147.78k (x0.84)

Performance/W
3750H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
4429 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
4158 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
968 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
297 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
9852 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-10210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
5468 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
4953 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1134 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1785 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
13340 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4