| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i3-9100T


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-9100T is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i3-9100T gets 192.9 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-9100T is 1.1 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906eb
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
60.16k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
192.88k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.79k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
15.65k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.59k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
7.78k (x1.41)
TOTAL
30.46k
31.81k (x1.04)

Multithread

3750H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
13.97k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
57.83k (x0.77)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
17.03k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
4.35k (x0.72)
TOTAL
123.97k
93.18k (x0.75)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
24.89k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
21.82k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
4.83k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.63k (x1.64)
TOTAL
46.91k
60.16k (x1.28)

Multithread

3750H

i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
89.4k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
81.19k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
18.06k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
4.24k (x0.7)
TOTAL
175.18k
192.88k (x1.1)

Performance/W
3750H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2554 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2320 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
516 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
121 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
5511 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i3-9100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6727 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5897 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1304 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2331 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
16260 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4