| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i3-8350K


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-8350K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i3-8350K gets 237.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i3-8350K is 1.4 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
906eb
Core
Picasso
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/4
TDP
35 W
91 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
October 2017
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
68.36k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
237.63k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
27.29k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
24.19k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.75k (x1.15)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
11.13k (x2.11)
TOTAL
46.91k
68.36k (x1.46)

Multithread

3750H

i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
107.78k (x2.13)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
95.93k (x1.03)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
22.65k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
11.26k (x1.86)
TOTAL
175.18k
237.63k (x1.36)

Performance/W
3750H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1184 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1054 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
249 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
124 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
2611 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i3-8350K
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6823 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
6048 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1436 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2784 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
17091 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4