| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i3-10110U


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10110U is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i3-10110U gets 106.6 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.6 times faster than the i3-10110U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806ec
Core
Picasso
Comet Lake-U
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1528
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
4096 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
56.64k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
106.58k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
4.26k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
15.48k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
4.94k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
4.31k (x0.78)
TOTAL
30.46k
28.98k (x0.95)

Multithread

3750H

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
7.41k (x0.49)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
29.18k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
10.26k (x0.37)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
3.27k (x0.54)
TOTAL
123.97k
50.13k (x0.4)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
24.6k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
22.32k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.02k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
4.7k (x0.89)
TOTAL
46.91k
56.64k (x1.21)

Multithread

3750H

i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
47.98k (x0.95)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
44.28k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
10.33k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
3.98k (x0.66)
TOTAL
175.18k
106.58k (x0.61)

Performance/W
3750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
3199 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2952 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
265 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
7105 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i3-10110U
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
6001 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5444 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1225 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1146 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
13815 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4