Ryzen 7 3750H vs Engineering Sample 506E8
Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 506E8 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 1.2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 506E8 gets 211.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 506E8 is 1.2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
810f81
506e8
Core
Picasso
Kaby Lake
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.4 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
3.7 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
4/8
4/8
TDP
35 W
- W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
8192 kB
Date
January 2019
June 2016
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
56.39k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
211.6k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
23.91k (x1.74)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
21.03k (x0.92)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
5.05k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
6.4k (x1.21)
TOTAL
46.91k
56.39k (x1.2)
Multithread
3750H
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
95.3k (x1.89)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
91.94k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
22.06k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
2.3k (x0.38)
TOTAL
175.18k
211.6k (x1.21)
Performance/W
3750H
506E8
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W