| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 7 PRO 4750GE


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4750GE is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 4750GE gets 469.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 4750GE is 2.7 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
860f01
Core
Picasso
Renoir
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
2x4096 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
60.99k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
469.67k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
16.95k (x1.24)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
26.26k (x1.15)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
9.4k (x1.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
8.38k (x1.59)
TOTAL
46.91k
60.99k (x1.3)

Multithread

3750H

4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
159.87k (x3.16)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
215.44k (x2.31)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
88.45k (x3.5)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
5.9k (x0.97)
TOTAL
175.18k
469.67k (x2.68)

Performance/W
3750H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
4568 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
6155 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
2527 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
169 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
13419 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
4750GE
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3942 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
6107 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2185 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1950 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
14184 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4