| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs 5800H


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 5800H is based on Zen 3.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 5800H gets 426.9 k points.

Summarizing, the 5800H is 2.4 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
a50f00
Core
Picasso
Cezanne
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA 1140
Cores/Threads
4/8
8/16
TDP
35 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
8x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
16384 kB
Date
January 2019
February 2021
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
74.56k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
426.9k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
4.31k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
17.51k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
10.53k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
23.57k (x4.28)
TOTAL
30.46k
55.92k (x1.84)

Multithread

3750H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
24.18k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
117.98k (x1.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
70.96k (x2.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
8.08k (x1.33)
TOTAL
123.97k
221.19k (x1.78)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
20.37k (x1.48)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
22.52k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
10.18k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
21.49k (x4.08)
TOTAL
46.91k
74.56k (x1.59)

Multithread

3750H

5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
144.01k (x2.85)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
191.86k (x2.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
84.53k (x3.35)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
6.5k (x1.07)
TOTAL
175.18k
426.9k (x2.44)

Performance/W
3750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
3200 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
4264 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
1878 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
144 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
9487 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
5800H
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
4630 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5117 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2314 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
4883 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
16944 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4