| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Ryzen 5 3600


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the 3600 is based on Zen 2.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the 3600 gets 348.4 k points.

Summarizing, the 3600 is 2 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
870f10
Core
Picasso
Matisse
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
AM4
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x512 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
32768 kB
Date
January 2019
July 2019
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
70.55k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
348.35k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
4.2k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
17.36k (x1.06)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
7.5k (x1.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
23.79k (x4.32)
TOTAL
30.46k
52.85k (x1.73)

Multithread

3750H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
22.11k (x1.46)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
108.04k (x1.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
56.81k (x2.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
36.39k (x5.99)
TOTAL
123.97k
223.36k (x1.8)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
16.04k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
24.47k (x1.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
8.38k (x1.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
21.66k (x4.11)
TOTAL
46.91k
70.55k (x1.5)

Multithread

3750H

3600
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
113.63k (x2.25)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
143.55k (x1.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
63.84k (x2.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
27.34k (x4.51)
TOTAL
175.18k
348.35k (x1.99)

Performance/W
3750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1748 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
2208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
982 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
421 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
5359 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
3600
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
3819 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5825 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
1995 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
5158 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
16797 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4