| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i5-12400F


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-12400F is based on Alder Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i5-12400F gets 399.4 k points.

Summarizing, the i5-12400F is 2.3 times faster than the 3750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
90675
Core
Picasso
Alder Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
LGA 1700
Cores/Threads
4/8
6/12
TDP
35 W
117 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
6x32/0x64+6x48/0x32 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
6x1280+0x2048 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
18432 kB
Date
January 2019
January 2022
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
76.46k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
399.39k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
7.43k (x1.96)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
18.64k (x1.14)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
13.15k (x2.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
14.82k (x2.69)
TOTAL
30.46k
54.04k (x1.77)

Multithread

3750H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
36.23k (x2.39)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
134.76k (x1.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
84.06k (x3.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
16.71k (x2.75)
TOTAL
123.97k
271.76k (x2.19)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
33.85k (x2.47)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
20.33k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
10.51k (x2.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
11.77k (x2.24)
TOTAL
46.91k
76.46k (x1.63)

Multithread

3750H

i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
174.21k (x3.45)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
141.31k (x1.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
64.86k (x2.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
19.01k (x3.13)
TOTAL
175.18k
399.39k (x2.28)

Performance/W
3750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
1489 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1208 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
554 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
162 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
3414 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i5-12400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
7693 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
4621 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2389 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
2675 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
17378 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4