| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3750H vs Core i3-1115G4


Description
The 3750H is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-1115G4 is based on Tiger Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3750H gets a score of 175.2 k points while the i3-1115G4 gets 138 k points.

Summarizing, the 3750H is 1.3 times faster than the i3-1115G4. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
810f81
806c1
Core
Picasso
Tiger Lake UP3
Architecture
Base frecuency
2.3 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4 GHz
4.1 GHz
Socket
BGA-FP5
BGA1449
Cores/Threads
4/8
2/4
TDP
35 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
4x64+4x32 kB
2x32+2x48 kB
Cache L2
4x512 kB
2x1280 kB
Cache L3
4096 kB
6144 kB
Date
January 2019
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
46.91k points
62.19k points
Mean multithread perf.
175.18k points
137.96k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
3750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3.78k
3.75k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
16.42k
17.22k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.75k
9.79k (x2.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.51k
8.21k (x1.49)
TOTAL
30.46k
38.97k (x1.28)

Multithread

3750H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
15.18k
9.19k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
74.87k
35.47k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
27.85k
19.14k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.08k
5.82k (x0.96)
TOTAL
123.97k
69.62k (x0.56)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
13.72k
24.25k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
22.93k
21.63k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
4.99k
9.09k (x1.82)
Test#1 (Memory)
5.27k
7.23k (x1.37)
TOTAL
46.91k
62.19k (x1.33)

Multithread

3750H

i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
50.54k
56.9k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
93.33k
55.68k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
25.25k
19.29k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
6.07k
6.09k (x1)
TOTAL
175.18k
137.96k (x0.79)

Performance/W
3750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
1444 points/W
2032 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2667 points/W
1989 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
721 points/W
689 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
173 points/W
217 points/W
TOTAL
5005 points/W
4927 points/W

Performance/GHz
3750H
i3-1115G4
Test#1 (Integers)
3430 points/GHz
5914 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5733 points/GHz
5275 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1248 points/GHz
2216 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
1317 points/GHz
1764 points/GHz
TOTAL
11726 points/GHz
15169 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4