| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-9750H


Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-9750H is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 491.2 k points while the i7-9750H gets 276.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.8 times faster than the i7-9750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
906ed
Core
Matisse
Coffee Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
74.75k points
62.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
491.15k points
276.46k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
16.81k
25.22k (x1.5)
Test#2 (FP)
26.39k
21.97k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.02k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.73k
10.71k (x0.47)
TOTAL
74.75k
62.92k (x0.84)

Multithread

3700X

i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
170.29k
125.56k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
213.21k
115.86k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.03k
25.63k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.62k
9.4k (x0.81)
TOTAL
491.15k
276.46k (x0.56)

Performance/W
3700X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
2790 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3280 points/W
2575 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1477 points/W
570 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
179 points/W
209 points/W
TOTAL
7556 points/W
6144 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700X
i7-9750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3821 points/GHz
5605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5998 points/GHz
4882 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2005 points/GHz
1115 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5166 points/GHz
2380 points/GHz
TOTAL
16990 points/GHz
13982 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4