Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-7700
Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-7700 is based on Kaby Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 491.2 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.9 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 491.2 k points while the i7-7700 gets 257.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.9 times faster than the i7-7700 . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906e9
Core
Matisse
Kaby Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
8192 kB
Date
July 2019
September 2016
Mean monothread perf.
74.75k points
67.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
491.15k points
257.52k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
16.81k
26.7k (x1.59)
Test#2 (FP)
26.39k
23.7k (x0.9)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.46k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.73k
11.48k (x0.5)
TOTAL
74.75k
67.33k (x0.9)
Multithread
3700X
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
170.29k
115.97k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
213.21k
108.43k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.03k
26.28k (x0.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.62k
6.85k (x0.59)
TOTAL
491.15k
257.52k (x0.52)
Performance/W
3700X
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
1784 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3280 points/W
1668 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1477 points/W
404 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
179 points/W
105 points/W
TOTAL
7556 points/W
3962 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700X
i7-7700
Test#1 (Integers)
3821 points/GHz
6356 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5998 points/GHz
5643 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2005 points/GHz
1300 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5166 points/GHz
2733 points/GHz
TOTAL
16990 points/GHz
16032 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4