| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i5-10400F


Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i5-10400F is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 491.2 k points while the i5-10400F gets 370 k points.

Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.3 times faster than the i5-10400F. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
870f10
a0653
Core
Matisse
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.9 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
65 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
12288 kB
Date
July 2019
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
74.75k points
68.14k points
Mean multithread perf.
491.15k points
369.97k points

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
16.81k
26.28k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.39k
23.38k (x0.89)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
5.52k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.73k
12.96k (x0.57)
TOTAL
74.75k
68.14k (x0.91)

Multithread

3700X

i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
170.29k
163.67k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
213.21k
159.74k (x0.75)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.03k
39k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.62k
7.56k (x0.65)
TOTAL
491.15k
369.97k (x0.75)

Performance/W
3700X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
2518 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3280 points/W
2457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1477 points/W
600 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
179 points/W
116 points/W
TOTAL
7556 points/W
5692 points/W

Performance/GHz
3700X
i5-10400F
Test#1 (Integers)
3821 points/GHz
6112 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5998 points/GHz
5438 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2005 points/GHz
1283 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5166 points/GHz
3014 points/GHz
TOTAL
16990 points/GHz
15847 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4