Ryzen 7 3700X vs Core i7-1260P
Description
The 3700X is based on Zen 2 architecture while the i7-1260P is based on Alder Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 491.2 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 3700X gets a score of 491.2 k points while the i7-1260P gets 391.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 3700X is 1.3 times faster than the i7-1260P. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
870f10
906a3
Core
Matisse
Alder Lake-P
Base frecuency
3.6 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.4 GHz
4.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1744
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/16
TDP
65 W
28 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x32+8x32 kB
4x32/8X64+4x48/8X32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x1280+8x2048 kB
Cache L3
32768 kB
18432 kB
Date
July 2019
February 2022
Mean monothread perf.
74.75k points
94.9k points
Mean multithread perf.
491.15k points
391.07k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
3700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
16.81k
41.94k (x2.5)
Test#2 (FP)
26.39k
26.81k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
8.82k
12.63k (x1.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
22.73k
13.51k (x0.59)
TOTAL
74.75k
94.9k (x1.27)
Multithread
3700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
170.29k
168.12k (x0.99)
Test#2 (FP)
213.21k
148.09k (x0.69)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
96.03k
60.28k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
11.62k
14.58k (x1.25)
TOTAL
491.15k
391.07k (x0.8)
Performance/W
3700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
2620 points/W
6004 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
3280 points/W
5289 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1477 points/W
2153 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
179 points/W
521 points/W
TOTAL
7556 points/W
13967 points/W
Performance/GHz
3700X
i7-1260P
Test#1 (Integers)
3821 points/GHz
8924 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5998 points/GHz
5705 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
2005 points/GHz
2687 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
5166 points/GHz
2875 points/GHz
TOTAL
16990 points/GHz
20191 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4