| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Xeon Silver 4110


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the 4110 is based on Skylake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the 4110 gets 281.5 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.5 times faster than the 4110. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
50654
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Skylake-SP
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA3647
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
85 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
11264 kB
Date
April 2018
July 2017
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
45.82k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
281.48k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
12.29k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.64k (x0.62)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
6.55k (x0.31)
TOTAL
51.17k
25.46k (x0.5)

Multithread

2700X

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
20.42k (x0.58)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
95.83k (x0.53)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
30.88k (x0.48)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
9.7k (x1.18)
TOTAL
289.54k
156.83k (x0.54)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
18.78k (x1.2)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
16.25k (x0.62)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.99k (x0.68)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
6.8k (x0.37)
TOTAL
65.87k
45.82k (x0.7)

Multithread

2700X

4110
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
133.55k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
108.43k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
30.02k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
9.48k (x1.16)
TOTAL
433.19k
281.48k (x0.65)

Performance/W
2700X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1571 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1276 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
353 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
112 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
3311 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
4110
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6259 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5417 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1330 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
2267 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15273 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4