Ryzen 7 2700X vs Xeon E5-2697 v2
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2697 v2 is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 412.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 412.1 k points while the E5-2697 v2 gets 633.1 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2697 v2 is 1.5 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
306e4
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Ivy Bridge-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011
Cores/Threads
8/16
12 /24
TDP
105 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
27.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
633.14k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3.44k (x0.81)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
9.54k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.21k (x0.72)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
3.94k (x0.18)
TOTAL
51.17k
21.13k (x0.41)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
73.17k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
230.83k (x1.27)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
107.14k (x1.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
7.99k (x0.97)
TOTAL
289.54k
419.12k (x1.45)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
10.64k (x0.7)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
9.53k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
4.12k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
3.62k (x0.17)
TOTAL
66.21k
27.91k (x0.42)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
252.69k (x1.99)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
238.68k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
115.5k (x1.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
10.98k (x1.12)
TOTAL
428.19k
617.84k (x1.44)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
10.53k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
9.98k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
4k (x0.69)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
3.4k (x0.18)
TOTAL
64.24k
27.92k (x0.43)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
247.05k (x2.02)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
264.43k (x1.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
111.01k (x1.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
10.66k (x1.08)
TOTAL
412.13k
633.14k (x1.54)
Performance/W
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/W
1900 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2099 points/W
2034 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
854 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
82 points/W
TOTAL
3925 points/W
4870 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
E5-2697 v2
Test#1 (Integers)
3358 points/GHz
3007 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5796 points/GHz
2852 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1144 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4435 points/GHz
973 points/GHz
TOTAL
14939 points/GHz
7976 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4