Ryzen 7 2700X vs Xeon E5-2670 v3
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the E5-2670 v3 is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the E5-2670 v3 gets 452.9 k points.
Summarizing, the E5-2670 v3 is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
306f2
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Haswell-EP
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.1 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2011-3
Cores/Threads
8/16
12/24
TDP
105 W
120 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
12x32+12x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
12x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
30720 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
36.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
452.9k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3.52k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
8.68k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
2.83k (x0.49)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
3.13k (x0.15)
TOTAL
51.17k
18.17k (x0.36)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
32.7k (x0.93)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
105.18k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
35.18k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
9.54k (x1.16)
TOTAL
289.54k
182.59k (x0.63)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
11.08k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
9.57k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
3.18k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
3.28k (x0.16)
TOTAL
66.21k
27.11k (x0.41)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
139.07k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
133.47k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
46.6k (x0.75)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
6.65k (x0.68)
TOTAL
428.19k
325.78k (x0.76)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
11.18k (x0.77)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
10.06k (x0.4)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
3.21k (x0.55)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
3.12k (x0.16)
TOTAL
64.24k
27.57k (x0.43)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
140.98k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
145.37k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
45.62k (x0.76)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
6.75k (x0.68)
TOTAL
412.13k
338.73k (x0.82)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
18.62k (x1.21)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
10.49k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
4.04k (x0.7)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
3.26k (x0.18)
TOTAL
64.83k
36.41k (x0.56)
Multithread
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
236.25k (x1.92)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
151.05k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
58.9k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
6.7k (x0.82)
TOTAL
431.14k
452.9k (x1.05)
Performance/W
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1969 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
1259 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
491 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
56 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
3774 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
E5-2670 v3
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6006 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
3385 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1303 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
1052 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
11745 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4