Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-9900KF
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-9900KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.4 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i9-9900KF gets 592.9 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-9900KF is 1.4 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ed
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
84.54k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
592.86k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
33.03k (x2.12)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
29.52k (x1.13)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.55k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
15.45k (x0.84)
TOTAL
65.87k
84.54k (x1.28)
Multithread
2700X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
276.22k (x2.24)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
250.61k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
57.2k (x0.93)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
8.84k (x1.08)
TOTAL
433.19k
592.86k (x1.37)
Performance/W
2700X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
2908 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
2638 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
602 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
93 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
6241 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-9900KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6605 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5904 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1309 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
3090 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
16909 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4