Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-9880H
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-9880H is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-9880H gets 381.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i9-9880H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ed
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16386 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
73.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
381.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
27.81k (x1.81)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
25.88k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.65k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
14.19k (x0.79)
TOTAL
64.83k
73.53k (x1.13)
Multithread
2700X
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
175.69k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
166.56k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
35.04k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
4.23k (x0.52)
TOTAL
431.14k
381.53k (x0.88)
Performance/W
2700X
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3904 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3701 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
779 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
94 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
8478 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-9880H
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
5793 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5392 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1178 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2956 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
15319 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4