Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10980XE
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10980XE is based on Cascade Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i9-10980XE gets 1241.1 k points.
Summarizing, the i9-10980XE is 2.9 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
50657
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Cascade Lake-X
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 2066
Cores/Threads
8/16
18/36
TDP
105 W
165 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
18x32+18x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
18x1024 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
25344 kB
Date
April 2018
November 2019
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
68.33k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
1241.12k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.52k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.94k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.5k (x0.94)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
9.64k (x0.45)
TOTAL
51.17k
37.6k (x0.73)
Multithread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
84.93k (x2.42)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
409.55k (x2.26)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
122.88k (x1.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
22.12k (x2.69)
TOTAL
289.54k
639.48k (x2.21)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.03k (x1.05)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
23.95k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.03k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
9.37k (x0.45)
TOTAL
66.21k
55.38k (x0.84)
Multithread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
316.11k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
503.75k (x2.19)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
131.82k (x2.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
22.24k (x2.28)
TOTAL
428.19k
973.92k (x2.27)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.4k (x1.14)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
20.97k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.82k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
8.86k (x0.46)
TOTAL
64.24k
52.05k (x0.81)
Multithread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
316.84k (x2.6)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
461.09k (x2.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
129.82k (x2.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
22.09k (x2.23)
TOTAL
412.13k
929.85k (x2.26)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
29.53k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.59k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.99k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
10.22k (x0.57)
TOTAL
64.83k
68.33k (x1.05)
Multithread
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
587.06k (x4.77)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
496.41k (x2.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
134.66k (x2.22)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
22.99k (x2.81)
TOTAL
431.14k
1241.12k (x2.88)
Performance/W
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
3558 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3009 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
816 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
139 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
7522 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-10980XE
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6153 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
4707 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1248 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2129 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
14236 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4