| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i9-10900K


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i9-10900K is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i9-10900K gets 685.6 k points.

Summarizing, the i9-10900K is 1.6 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0655
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5.2 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
10/20
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
10x32+10x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
10x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
20480 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
80.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
685.65k points

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
19.5k (x1.28)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
28.01k (x1.16)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
7.45k (x1.27)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
15.82k (x0.75)
TOTAL
66.21k
70.79k (x1.07)

Multithread

2700X

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
194.49k (x1.53)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
312.59k (x1.36)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
89.14k (x1.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
12.58k (x1.29)
TOTAL
428.19k
608.81k (x1.42)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
32.67k (x2.09)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
28.49k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.53k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
12.72k (x0.69)
TOTAL
65.87k
80.41k (x1.22)

Multithread

2700X

i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
307.39k (x2.49)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
298.47k (x1.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
72.94k (x1.19)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
6.85k (x0.84)
TOTAL
433.19k
685.65k (x1.58)

Performance/W
2700X
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
2459 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
583 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
5485 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i9-10900K
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6282 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5479 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1257 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
2445 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15463 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4