| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-5820K


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-5820K is based on Haswell.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 412.1 k points while the i7-5820K gets 129.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.2 times faster than the i7-5820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
306f2
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Haswell-E
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
140 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
15360 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2014
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
31.53k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
129.06k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3.82k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
9.64k (x0.49)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
4.29k (x0.73)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
3.78k (x0.18)
TOTAL
51.17k
21.53k (x0.42)

Multithread

2700X

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
18.07k (x0.52)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
64.25k (x0.35)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
27.03k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.03k (x0.98)
TOTAL
289.54k
117.38k (x0.41)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
12.03k (x0.83)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
11.23k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
4.55k (x0.78)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
3.72k (x0.2)
TOTAL
64.24k
31.53k (x0.49)

Multithread

2700X

i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
49.48k (x0.41)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
52.21k (x0.24)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
19.7k (x0.33)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
7.67k (x0.77)
TOTAL
412.13k
129.06k (x0.31)

Performance/W
2700X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/W
353 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2099 points/W
373 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
141 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
3925 points/W
922 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-5820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3358 points/GHz
3343 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5796 points/GHz
3119 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1264 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4435 points/GHz
1033 points/GHz
TOTAL
14939 points/GHz
8759 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4