Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-4820K
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4820K is based on Ivy Bridge.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 412.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 412.1 k points while the i7-4820K gets 134.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.1 times faster than the i7-4820K . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
306e4
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Ivy Bridge -E
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.9 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1155
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
130 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
32+32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2013
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
32.49k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
134.08k points
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
11.85k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
11.84k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
4.69k (x0.81)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
4.12k (x0.22)
TOTAL
64.24k
32.49k (x0.51)
Multithread
2700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
47.65k (x0.39)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
54.81k (x0.25)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
21.56k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
10.05k (x1.01)
TOTAL
412.13k
134.08k (x0.33)
Performance/W
2700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
1162 points/W
367 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2099 points/W
422 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
570 points/W
166 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
94 points/W
77 points/W
TOTAL
3925 points/W
1031 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-4820K
Test#1 (Integers)
3358 points/GHz
3039 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5796 points/GHz
3035 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1350 points/GHz
1201 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4435 points/GHz
1056 points/GHz
TOTAL
14939 points/GHz
8331 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4