Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-4765T
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-4765T is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.2 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i7-4765T gets 134.5 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 3.2 times faster than the i7-4765T . To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
306c3
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1150
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
May 2013
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
31.31k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
134.53k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
15.61k (x1)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
8.8k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.58k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
3.33k (x0.18)
TOTAL
65.87k
31.31k (x0.48)
Multithread
2700X
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
66k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
43.27k (x0.18)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
17.39k (x0.28)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.88k (x0.96)
TOTAL
433.19k
134.53k (x0.31)
Performance/W
2700X
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1886 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1236 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
497 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
225 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
3844 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-4765T
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
5203 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
2932 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1193 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
1110 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
10438 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4