Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-10870H
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10870H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i7-10870H gets 487 k points.
Summarizing, the i7-10870H is 1.1 times faster than the 2700X. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.2 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
8/16
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
8x32+8x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
8x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
16384 kB
Date
April 2018
September 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
79.2k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
487.05k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.77k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
19.81k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.29k (x1.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
14.03k (x0.66)
TOTAL
51.17k
44.9k (x0.88)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
31.21k (x0.89)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
151.01k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
50.13k (x0.77)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.37k (x1.02)
TOTAL
289.54k
240.71k (x0.83)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
17.17k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
25.26k (x1.05)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.7k (x1.14)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
13.81k (x0.66)
TOTAL
66.21k
62.95k (x0.95)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
116.68k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
187.28k (x0.81)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
51.52k (x0.83)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
8.39k (x0.86)
TOTAL
428.19k
363.87k (x0.85)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.14k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
24.74k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.98k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
12.7k (x0.67)
TOTAL
64.24k
59.55k (x0.93)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
117.03k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
199.88k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
50.64k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
8.23k (x0.83)
TOTAL
412.13k
375.77k (x0.91)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
30.38k (x1.98)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
27.95k (x1.09)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
6.51k (x1.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
14.37k (x0.8)
TOTAL
64.83k
79.2k (x1.22)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
216.18k (x1.76)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
210.82k (x0.88)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
51.57k (x0.85)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
8.47k (x1.04)
TOTAL
431.14k
487.05k (x1.13)
Performance/W
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
4804 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
4685 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
1146 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
188 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
10823 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-10870H
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6075 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5589 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1302 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2873 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
15840 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4