Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i7-10750H
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i7-10750H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i7-10750H gets 349.2 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i7-10750H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
75.67k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
349.21k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.69k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
18.71k (x0.95)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.84k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
13.95k (x0.65)
TOTAL
51.17k
43.19k (x0.84)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
18.79k (x0.54)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
86.1k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
27.42k (x0.42)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.27k (x0.64)
TOTAL
289.54k
137.58k (x0.48)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.63k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
24.17k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.38k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
13.69k (x0.65)
TOTAL
66.21k
60.87k (x0.92)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
67.07k (x0.53)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
107.95k (x0.47)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
27.05k (x0.44)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
5.07k (x0.52)
TOTAL
428.19k
207.14k (x0.48)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.71k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
25.45k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
6.06k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
13.2k (x0.69)
TOTAL
64.24k
61.43k (x0.96)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
67.59k (x0.55)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
111.94k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
27.7k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
5.3k (x0.54)
TOTAL
412.13k
212.53k (x0.52)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
29.06k (x1.86)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
26.49k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.23k (x1.07)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
13.89k (x0.76)
TOTAL
65.87k
75.67k (x1.15)
Multithread
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
154.61k (x1.25)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
151.34k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
36.33k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
6.93k (x0.85)
TOTAL
433.19k
349.21k (x0.81)
Performance/W
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
3436 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
3363 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
807 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
154 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
7760 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i7-10750H
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
5811 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5298 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1246 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
2778 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15133 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4