Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-9600KF
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-9600KF is based on Coffee Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i5-9600KF gets 371.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9600KF. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ec
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2018
January 2019
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
77.34k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
371.08k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.63k (x1.09)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
19.43k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.17k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
13.82k (x0.65)
TOTAL
51.17k
44.04k (x0.86)
Multithread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
26.64k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
110.11k (x0.61)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
33.07k (x0.51)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.3k (x1.01)
TOTAL
289.54k
178.11k (x0.62)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.5k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
24.35k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.54k (x1.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
13.59k (x0.65)
TOTAL
66.21k
60.98k (x0.92)
Multithread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
93.78k (x0.74)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
134.47k (x0.58)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
32.24k (x0.52)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
8.22k (x0.84)
TOTAL
428.19k
268.71k (x0.63)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.92k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
25.44k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
6.36k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
13.25k (x0.69)
TOTAL
64.24k
61.97k (x0.96)
Multithread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
95.51k (x0.78)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
143.19k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
33.85k (x0.57)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
8.21k (x0.83)
TOTAL
412.13k
280.77k (x0.68)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
30.52k (x1.95)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
26.54k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.41k (x1.1)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
13.87k (x0.76)
TOTAL
65.87k
77.34k (x1.17)
Multithread
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
174.66k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
154.06k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
34.11k (x0.56)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
8.24k (x1.01)
TOTAL
433.19k
371.08k (x0.86)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1839 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1622 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
359 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
87 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
3906 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-9600KF
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6635 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5769 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1394 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
3015 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
16813 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4