| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-9600K


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-9600K is based on Coffee Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-9600K gets 372.7 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-9600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
906ed
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Coffee Lake-S
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.6 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1151
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/6
TDP
105 W
95 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
9216 kB
Date
April 2018
October 2018
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
77.75k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
372.74k points

Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.69k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
19.35k (x0.98)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.08k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
13.81k (x0.65)
TOTAL
51.17k
43.93k (x0.86)

Multithread

2700X

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
26.24k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
107.95k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
34.5k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
8.1k (x0.99)
TOTAL
289.54k
176.79k (x0.61)

SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.91k (x1.11)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
24.42k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.37k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
13.55k (x0.65)
TOTAL
66.21k
61.25k (x0.93)

Multithread

2700X

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
95.21k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
137.3k (x0.6)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
36.05k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
8.4k (x0.86)
TOTAL
428.19k
276.96k (x0.65)

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.75k (x1.16)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
25.5k (x1.02)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
6.17k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
13.06k (x0.68)
TOTAL
64.24k
61.48k (x0.96)

Multithread

2700X

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
96.03k (x0.79)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
143.78k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
35.06k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
8.45k (x0.85)
TOTAL
412.13k
283.33k (x0.69)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
30.64k (x2)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
26.75k (x1.04)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
6.33k (x1.09)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
14.03k (x0.78)
TOTAL
64.83k
77.75k (x1.2)

Multithread

2700X

i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
174.92k (x1.42)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
153.88k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
35.93k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
8k (x0.98)
TOTAL
431.14k
372.74k (x0.86)

Performance/W
2700X
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1841 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
1620 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
378 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
84 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
3924 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-9600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6661 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5815 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1376 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3049 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16902 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4