Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-4210U
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-4210U is based on Haswell.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 7.5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-4210U gets 57.6 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 7.5 times faster than the i5-4210U. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
40651
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Haswell
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
1.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
2.7 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1169
Cores/Threads
8/16
2/4
TDP
105 W
15 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
2x32+2x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
2x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
3072 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2014
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
27.41k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
57.58k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
2.95k (x0.69)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
7.38k (x0.37)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
3.11k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
2.91k (x0.14)
TOTAL
51.17k
16.35k (x0.32)
Multithread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
4.86k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
17.41k (x0.1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
7.09k (x0.11)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
2.5k (x0.3)
TOTAL
289.54k
31.86k (x0.11)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
9.26k (x0.61)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
8.2k (x0.34)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
3.57k (x0.61)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
2.92k (x0.14)
TOTAL
66.21k
23.95k (x0.36)
Multithread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
17.53k (x0.14)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
17.56k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
7.65k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
2.49k (x0.25)
TOTAL
428.19k
45.22k (x0.11)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
5.05k (x0.35)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
5.31k (x0.21)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
2.1k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
1.41k (x0.07)
TOTAL
64.24k
13.87k (x0.22)
Multithread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
9.01k (x0.07)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
16.3k (x0.07)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
4.64k (x0.08)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
2.16k (x0.22)
TOTAL
412.13k
32.1k (x0.08)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
13.79k (x0.9)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
7.79k (x0.3)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
3.11k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
2.72k (x0.15)
TOTAL
64.83k
27.41k (x0.42)
Multithread
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
28.78k (x0.23)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
18.99k (x0.08)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
7.21k (x0.12)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
2.6k (x0.32)
TOTAL
431.14k
57.58k (x0.13)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
1919 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
1266 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
481 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
174 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
3839 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-4210U
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
5108 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
2884 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1150 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
1008 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
10151 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4