Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-10600K
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10600K is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i5-10600K gets 352.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.2 times faster than the i5-10600K. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0655
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
4.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
125 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
73.05k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
352.88k points
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
30.11k (x1.93)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
26.16k (x1)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
6.01k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
10.77k (x0.59)
TOTAL
65.87k
73.05k (x1.11)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
158.82k (x1.29)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
150.39k (x0.63)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
36.56k (x0.6)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
7.11k (x0.87)
TOTAL
433.19k
352.88k (x0.81)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1271 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1203 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
293 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
57 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
2823 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-10600K
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6273 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5449 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1252 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
2243 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15218 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4