Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-10500T
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10500T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-10500T gets 302.1 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.4 times faster than the i5-10500T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0653
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.3 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
3.8 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
35 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
64.6k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
302.13k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
3.87k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
15.79k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.1k (x0.87)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
12.13k (x0.57)
TOTAL
51.17k
36.89k (x0.72)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
22.17k (x0.63)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
101.79k (x0.56)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
34.13k (x0.53)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.74k (x0.46)
TOTAL
289.54k
161.83k (x0.56)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
13.94k (x0.92)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
20.01k (x0.83)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.34k (x0.91)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
11.41k (x0.54)
TOTAL
66.21k
50.7k (x0.77)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
82.18k (x0.65)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
124.23k (x0.54)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
35.6k (x0.58)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
3.73k (x0.38)
TOTAL
428.19k
245.75k (x0.57)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
14.01k (x0.97)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
21.17k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.21k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
11.42k (x0.6)
TOTAL
64.24k
51.82k (x0.81)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
82.38k (x0.68)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
115.64k (x0.52)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
32.22k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
3.71k (x0.37)
TOTAL
412.13k
233.94k (x0.57)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
25.16k (x1.64)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
22.28k (x0.87)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.18k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
11.97k (x0.67)
TOTAL
64.83k
64.6k (x1)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
144.86k (x1.18)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
120.98k (x0.51)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
32.55k (x0.54)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
3.73k (x0.46)
TOTAL
431.14k
302.13k (x0.7)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
4139 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
3457 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
930 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
107 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
8632 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-10500T
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6621 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5863 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1364 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3151 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16999 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4