Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-10500H
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10500H is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i5-10500H gets 379 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
72.1k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
378.99k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.98k (x1.17)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
17.92k (x0.91)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.81k (x1)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
12.55k (x0.59)
TOTAL
51.17k
41.26k (x0.81)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
29.53k (x0.84)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
118.16k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
38.43k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
5.29k (x0.64)
TOTAL
289.54k
191.41k (x0.66)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
15.89k (x1.04)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
22.74k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.09k (x1.04)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
12.49k (x0.59)
TOTAL
66.21k
57.21k (x0.86)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
96.8k (x0.76)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
149.1k (x0.65)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
39.68k (x0.64)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
5.28k (x0.54)
TOTAL
428.19k
290.85k (x0.68)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
15.86k (x1.1)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
24.07k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.94k (x1.02)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
11.82k (x0.62)
TOTAL
64.24k
57.69k (x0.9)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
97.37k (x0.8)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
154.42k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
38.76k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
5.4k (x0.55)
TOTAL
412.13k
295.96k (x0.72)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
27.93k (x1.79)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
25.41k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.91k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
12.85k (x0.7)
TOTAL
65.87k
72.1k (x1.09)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
176.41k (x1.43)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
158.8k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
38.53k (x0.63)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
5.25k (x0.64)
TOTAL
433.19k
378.99k (x0.87)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
2714 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
2443 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
593 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
81 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
5831 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-10500H
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6207 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5647 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1313 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
2856 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
16023 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4