Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-10500
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10500 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-10500 gets 388 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.1 times faster than the i5-10500. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0653
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.1 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
6/12
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
6x32+6x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
6x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
12288 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
75.27k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
387.99k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.52k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
18.52k (x0.94)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.58k (x0.96)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
14.2k (x0.66)
TOTAL
51.17k
42.82k (x0.84)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
25.26k (x0.72)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
120.48k (x0.66)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
38.12k (x0.59)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
7.68k (x0.94)
TOTAL
289.54k
191.54k (x0.66)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.3k (x1.07)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
23.22k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.22k (x1.06)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
14.05k (x0.67)
TOTAL
66.21k
59.79k (x0.9)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
92.61k (x0.73)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
147.68k (x0.64)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
40.71k (x0.66)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
7.78k (x0.8)
TOTAL
428.19k
288.77k (x0.67)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.33k (x1.13)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
24.73k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.99k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
13.64k (x0.72)
TOTAL
64.24k
60.69k (x0.94)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
91.64k (x0.75)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
158.71k (x0.72)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
39.84k (x0.67)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
7.76k (x0.78)
TOTAL
412.13k
297.94k (x0.72)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
28.73k (x1.87)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
26.01k (x1.01)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
6.08k (x1.05)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
14.46k (x0.81)
TOTAL
64.83k
75.27k (x1.16)
Multithread
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
172.66k (x1.4)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
167.57k (x0.7)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
39.45k (x0.65)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
8.31k (x1.02)
TOTAL
431.14k
387.99k (x0.9)
Performance/W
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
2656 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2578 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
607 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
128 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
5969 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-10500
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6384 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5780 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1351 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
3212 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
16727 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4