| | | | | | |

Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i5-10300H


Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i5-10300H is based on Comet Lake.

Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 431.1 k points while the i5-10300H gets 246.1 k points.

Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.8 times faster than the i5-10300H. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.

Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0652
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-H
Architecture
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
2.5 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.5 GHz
Socket
AM4
BGA 1440
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
45 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
8192 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
64.83k points
69.47k points
Mean multithread perf.
431.14k points
246.07k points

AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
15.65k (x1.08)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
23.13k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.66k (x0.97)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
11.43k (x0.6)
TOTAL
64.24k
55.87k (x0.87)

Multithread

2700X

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
26.77k (x0.22)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
43.81k (x0.2)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
10.17k (x0.17)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
11.91k (x1.2)
TOTAL
412.13k
92.66k (x0.22)

AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
15.34k
27.14k (x1.77)
Test#2 (FP)
25.75k
24.75k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.79k
5.73k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
17.95k
11.84k (x0.66)
TOTAL
64.83k
69.47k (x1.07)

Multithread

2700X

i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
123.07k
105.77k (x0.86)
Test#2 (FP)
239.3k
107.47k (x0.45)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
60.6k
24.82k (x0.41)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.18k
8.02k (x0.98)
TOTAL
431.14k
246.07k (x0.57)

Performance/W
2700X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
1172 points/W
2350 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2279 points/W
2388 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
577 points/W
552 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
178 points/W
TOTAL
4106 points/W
5468 points/W

Performance/GHz
2700X
i5-10300H
Test#1 (Integers)
3568 points/GHz
6031 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
5987 points/GHz
5500 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1347 points/GHz
1274 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4175 points/GHz
2632 points/GHz
TOTAL
15078 points/GHz
15437 points/GHz

Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.

Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.

If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.


Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com


Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]

grafica bm.hardlimit.com

Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4