Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i3-10105
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10105 is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i3-10105 gets 253.9 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.7 times faster than the i3-10105. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0653
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.7 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.4 GHz
Socket
AM4
LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
March 2021
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
68.92k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
253.93k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.5k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
18.39k (x0.93)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.78k (x0.99)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
8.3k (x0.39)
TOTAL
51.17k
36.97k (x0.72)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
16.13k (x0.46)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
75.62k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
27.88k (x0.43)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.57k (x0.44)
TOTAL
289.54k
123.2k (x0.43)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
16.19k (x1.06)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
23.07k (x0.96)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
6.04k (x1.03)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
8.46k (x0.4)
TOTAL
66.21k
53.77k (x0.81)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
57.59k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
100.63k (x0.44)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
28.59k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
3.56k (x0.36)
TOTAL
428.19k
190.38k (x0.44)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
16.11k (x1.12)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
24.12k (x0.97)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.71k (x0.98)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
7.89k (x0.41)
TOTAL
64.24k
53.83k (x0.84)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
58.25k (x0.48)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
105.73k (x0.48)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
27.8k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
3.51k (x0.35)
TOTAL
412.13k
195.29k (x0.47)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
28.9k (x1.85)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
25.85k (x0.99)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.88k (x1.01)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
8.29k (x0.45)
TOTAL
65.87k
68.92k (x1.05)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
111.69k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
110.23k (x0.46)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
28.45k (x0.46)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
3.56k (x0.44)
TOTAL
433.19k
253.93k (x0.59)
Performance/W
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1718 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1696 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
438 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
55 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
3907 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i3-10105
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
6568 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5876 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1337 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
1883 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
15664 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4