Ryzen 7 2700X vs Core i3-10100T
Description
The 2700X is based on Zen+ architecture while the i3-10100T is based on Comet Lake.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Using the multithread performance as a reference, the 2700X gets a score of 433.2 k points while the i3-10100T gets 227.7 k points.
Summarizing, the 2700X is 1.9 times faster than the i3-10100T. To get a proper comparison between both models, take a look to the data shown below.
Specs
CPUID
800f82
a0653
Core
Pinnacle Ridge
Comet Lake-S
Base frecuency
3.7 GHz
3.6 GHz
Boost frecuency
4.3 GHz
4.3 GHz
Socket
AM4
FC-LGA 1200
Cores/Threads
8/16
4/8
TDP
105 W
65 W
Cache L1 (d+i)
8x64+8x32 kB
4x32+4x32 kB
Cache L2
8x512 kB
4x256 kB
Cache L3
16384 kB
6144 kB
Date
April 2018
April 2020
Mean monothread perf.
65.87k points
60.06k points
Mean multithread perf.
433.19k points
227.67k points
Non-optimized benchmark
The benchmark in Mode 0 (FPU) measures cpu performance with non-optimized software. It uses the basic µinstructions from the i386 architecture with the i387 floating point unit. This mode is compatible with all CPUs so it's practical to compare very different CPUs
Monothread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
4.25k
4.32k (x1.02)
Test#2 (FP)
19.72k
15.7k (x0.8)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.04k (x0.86)
Test#1 (Memory)
21.36k
7.68k (x0.36)
TOTAL
51.17k
32.73k (x0.64)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
35.04k
16.59k (x0.47)
Test#2 (FP)
181.42k
71.1k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
64.86k
23.26k (x0.36)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.21k
3.86k (x0.47)
TOTAL
289.54k
114.81k (x0.4)
SSE3 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode I (SSE) is optimized for the use of SIMD instructions with 128 bits register and the SSE set up to version 3. Nearly every modern CPU has support for this mode.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.22k
13.84k (x0.91)
Test#2 (FP)
24.12k
19.79k (x0.82)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.87k
5.28k (x0.9)
Test#1 (Memory)
21k
8.31k (x0.4)
TOTAL
66.21k
47.22k (x0.71)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
126.81k
54.67k (x0.43)
Test#2 (FP)
229.86k
90.71k (x0.39)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.74k
24.11k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.77k
3.85k (x0.39)
TOTAL
428.19k
173.34k (x0.4)
AVX optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode II (AVX) is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the first version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX compatible CPU was released in 2011.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
14.44k
13.88k (x0.96)
Test#2 (FP)
24.92k
20.94k (x0.84)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.8k
5.18k (x0.89)
Test#1 (Memory)
19.07k
8.2k (x0.43)
TOTAL
64.24k
48.19k (x0.75)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
122.01k
54.88k (x0.45)
Test#2 (FP)
220.34k
93.17k (x0.42)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
59.89k
23.34k (x0.39)
Test#1 (Memory)
9.9k
3.85k (x0.39)
TOTAL
412.13k
175.24k (x0.43)
AVX2 optimized benchmark
The benchmark in mode III (AVX2), like AVX1, is optimized to used 256 bits registers beside the second version of the Advanced Vector Extensions (AVX). The first AVX2 compatible CPU was released in 2013.
Monothread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
15.61k
24.31k (x1.56)
Test#2 (FP)
26.08k
22.15k (x0.85)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
5.84k
5.14k (x0.88)
Test#1 (Memory)
18.34k
8.46k (x0.46)
TOTAL
65.87k
60.06k (x0.91)
Multithread
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
123.33k
101.48k (x0.82)
Test#2 (FP)
240.46k
98.04k (x0.41)
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
61.23k
24.28k (x0.4)
Test#1 (Memory)
8.17k
3.86k (x0.47)
TOTAL
433.19k
227.67k (x0.53)
Performance/W
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
1175 points/W
1561 points/W
Test#2 (FP)
2290 points/W
1508 points/W
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
583 points/W
374 points/W
Test#1 (Memory)
78 points/W
59 points/W
TOTAL
4126 points/W
3503 points/W
Performance/GHz
2700X
i3-10100T
Test#1 (Integers)
3631 points/GHz
5653 points/GHz
Test#2 (FP)
6065 points/GHz
5150 points/GHz
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP)
1357 points/GHz
1196 points/GHz
Test#1 (Memory)
4266 points/GHz
1967 points/GHz
TOTAL
15319 points/GHz
13967 points/GHz
Monothread performance graph
Monothread performance graphics gives the performance vs time. They are useful to measure the time it takes to the CPU to reach the maximum performance.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Usually, CPU's performance will be steady during these tests but if it has a slow frequency strategy, the first samples will show a lower score.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Multithread performance graph
Multithread graphs measure the performance against a heavy load during certain time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
If CPU's TDP doesn't limit the frequency and the machine is properly cooled, performance should remain steady vs time. Otherwise, the performance score will oscillate or decrease over time.
Test#1 (Integers) [points vs time]
Test#2 (FP) [points vs time]
Test#3 (Generic, ZIP) [points vs time]
Test#1 (Memory) [points vs time]
Hardlimit Benchmark Central - Ver. 3.11.4